Resources

For teachers & educators

Helping young people recognise manipulation, coercion and unsafe influence

What do you need today?

Start with a classroom activity

Choose the age group and format that fit your class. Each card keeps the key information visible; open “Details and source” for age ranges, access requirements and background. External resources open in a new tab.

  • Digital Matters: Introduction to Thinking Critically Online

    Internet Matters; listed by Educate Against Hate

    A ready-to-use pack for checking online information, with a lesson plan, slides and worksheets.

    Details and source

    Teaching resource

    For
    Key Stage 2, Years 5–6
    Format
    ZIP pack: PDF lesson plan, worksheets and PowerPoint slides
    Time
    50–120 minutes (lesson plan)

    Free direct ZIP download; no account required. Extract the ZIP to open the lesson plan, slides and worksheets.

    The Managing Online Information module includes a lesson plan, companion guide, assessments, slides and offline worksheets about checking online information.

    Covers: Information evaluation, fact and opinion, online safety

    Educate Against Hate, n.d.

    Download teaching pack (ZIP) (opens in a new tab)

  • Red Flags & Chatting Online

    Common Sense Education

    A short discussion lesson about boundaries and uncomfortable feelings in online conversations.

    Details and source

    Teaching resource

    For
    Grade 6 (US); select for your class context
    Format
    Lesson with dilemma discussion; account required
    Time
    20 minutes

    Free Common Sense Education account required to unlock the full lesson. The public page shows objectives, vocabulary and duration; full materials were not accessed while signed in.

    A specific lesson about setting boundaries in online conversations and recognising uncomfortable or worrying feelings.

    Covers: Online conversations, boundaries, red flag feelings

    Common Sense Education, n.d.

    Access lesson — free account required (opens in a new tab)

  • Media and Information Literacy and Misinformation — UNESCO Unit 5

    UNESCO

    A fact-checking exercise with learning objectives and suggested teaching activities.

    Details and source

    Intergovernmental guidance

    For
    Teacher background; adaptable across secondary ages
    Format
    Online curriculum unit with fact-checking exercise

    Free full-text unit; no account required. The main button opens the activities, rather than the curriculum catalogue.

    Includes learning objectives and a group exercise in checking claims, documenting research and discussing misleading information.

    Covers: Fact-checking, misinformation, information evaluation

    UNESCO, 2021

    Read unit and activities (opens in a new tab)

  • Fake News: How can we recognize fake news?

    Council of Europe

    A one-page lesson about spotting and checking fake news. Uses coronavirus-era examples.

    Details and source

    Intergovernmental guidance

    For
    Teacher-led media-literacy discussion; adapt to your class
    Format
    One-page lesson plan (PDF)

    Free English PDF; no registration. PDF contents verified through web retrieval; publisher blocks some automated server requests.

    A lesson plan with discussion prompts and a news-checking assignment. Its examples concern coronavirus misinformation; check or replace dated supporting links before teaching.

    Covers: Checking news, misinformation, responsible sharing

    Council of Europe, n.d.

    Open lesson plan (PDF) (opens in a new tab)

  • Conspiracy Theories in the Classroom

    Association for Citizenship Teaching; listed by Educate Against Hate

    Guidance for teachers approaching disinformation and conspiracy theories with pupils.

    Details and source

    Teaching resource

    For
    Teacher background; Key Stages 2–5
    Format
    Teacher guidance PDF

    Publisher registration/login step required to download the guidance. The public page identifies the document and authors; the gated PDF was not downloaded.

    Teacher guidance on approaching disinformation and conspiracy theories in schools; the listing identifies two University College London lecturers as authors.

    Covers: Conspiracy theories, disinformation, classroom discussion

    Educate Against Hate, n.d.

    Access guidance — registration required (opens in a new tab)

Five questions young people can learn to ask

Use a published media-literacy activity rather than asking children to assess whether someone is a cult member. These five prompts are shortened from Common Sense Education’s 5 Questions to Ask About Media, which draws on NAMLE’s work. They retain the worksheet’s five topics; the original wording and teacher guidance are available in the linked PDF.

  1. Who made it?
  2. Why was it created?
  3. Who is funding it?
  4. What is grabbing my attention?
  5. Whose views appear, and whose are missing?

The publisher recommends the worksheet for middle and high school. For younger children, start with a familiar advert or video and use Common Sense Education’s “Media: What’s the Purpose?” activity. Keep individual concerns about secrecy, threats or unsafe contact within adult safeguarding procedures.

Open the original questions and teacher guide (PDF) ↗

I’m worried about a pupil

Follow your school’s safeguarding procedures and raise concerns with the designated safeguarding lead or local equivalent. Listen without blame, record observations and disclosures accurately, and avoid confronting a suspected recruiter or asking a pupil to investigate. Individual signs are not proof of abuse; look at the pattern, the context and the child’s wellbeing.

Safeguarding and grooming guidance

Start with the guidance that applies where your school is located. The jurisdiction and access information for each resource are under “Details and source”.

  • Keeping children safe in education 2026: part one

    UK Department for Education

    The full staff guidance on recognising safeguarding concerns and following school procedures.

    Details and source

    Official guidance

    For
    All school and college staff
    Format
    Full part-one statutory guidance (PDF)
    Applies in
    England

    Free PDF for England; September 2026 edition (50 pages).

    The full staff guidance covers safeguarding responsibilities, recognising concerns and following school procedures. The publisher’s short overview is a companion to this document, not a replacement.

    Covers: Safeguarding, reporting concerns, school procedures

    Department for Education, 2026

    Open staff guidance (PDF) (opens in a new tab)

  • Grooming

    NSPCC

    Guidance on grooming, possible signs and responding when a child discloses abuse.

    Details and source

    Specialist NGO guidance

    For
    Teacher and safeguarding professional background
    Format
    Online guidance
    Applies in
    United Kingdom

    Free

    Explains grooming, online and in-person contexts, possible tactics and what to do when a child discloses abuse.

    Covers: Grooming, online contact, disclosure response

    NSPCC, n.d.

    Read grooming guidance (opens in a new tab)

  • What should I do if I have a concern about a child?

    Educate Against Hate / UK Department for Education

    Advice for education staff concerned about radicalisation, including school safeguarding routes.

    Details and source

    Specialist safeguarding guidance

    For
    Teachers and school staff in England
    Format
    Online guidance and contact information
    Applies in
    England

    Free

    Tells education staff concerned about radicalisation to follow school safeguarding procedures and consult their designated safeguarding lead; sets out England-specific support routes.

    Covers: Safeguarding, radicalisation concerns, referrals

    Educate Against Hate, n.d.

    Read safeguarding advice (opens in a new tab)

Recognising high-control environments: BITE and the Influence Continuum

Steven Hassan’s BITE Model brings together signs of Behavioural Control, Information Control, Thought Control and Emotional Control. The publisher’s BITE page offers the current download; the card below also provides an older direct English PDF. The Influence Continuum helps adults consider whether influence supports autonomy or undermines it.

Examples to consider when a pupil describes their experiences include:

  • Behaviour: someone else tightly dictating friendships, leisure, food, clothing or hairstyle, backed by pressure or punishment.
  • Information: discouraging independent reading, news or online sources, and forbidding contact with former members or critics.
  • Thought: using group-specific slogans to shut down reflection, or forbidding questions about a leader, teachings or rules.
  • Emotion: fear of disagreeing, or pressure to suppress doubt, anger or homesickness rather than discuss those feelings safely.

Some patterns may emerge in classroom conversations or playground interactions. A single rule, phrase, religious belief or change of appearance is not enough to identify abuse. Consider coercion, loss of choice and harm together, and share concerns through safeguarding channels. BITE and the Influence Continuum are adult practitioner frameworks, not diagnostic tests or questionnaires to administer to children.

  • BITE Model — English handout (2016 version)

    Steven Hassan; Freedom of Mind Resource Center

    A comprehensive list of behavioural, information, thought and emotional control patterns to help adults recognise a high-control environment. Direct English handout (2016 version).

    Details and source

    Practitioner framework

    For
    Teacher background; not a pupil assessment
    Format
    Two-page practitioner handout (PDF; older version)

    Free direct English PDF; no registration. This is the older 2016 handout, not the publisher’s latest download offered through its form.

    Steven Hassan describes the BITE Model as a way to describe methods used to recruit and maintain control, organized under Behavior, Information, Thought and Emotional control. The publisher recommends using it with the Influence Continuum and notes that not every group or relationship uses every tactic.

    Covers: Behavior, information, thought and emotional control

    Freedom of Mind Resource Center, n.d.

    Open BITE handout (PDF) (opens in a new tab)

  • Influence Continuum — English chart (2022 version)

    Steven Hassan; Freedom of Mind Resource Center

    A chart contrasting healthy, constructive influence with coercive and destructive influence. Read alongside BITE. English chart (2022 version).

    Details and source

    Practitioner framework

    For
    Teacher background
    Format
    Practitioner chart (PDF; 2022 version)

    Free direct English PDF; no registration. This is the older 2022 chart, not the latest version offered through the publisher’s form.

    The publisher describes the Influence Continuum as a framework spanning healthy persuasion and education through undue coercion and manipulation, and says it is designed to be used with the BITE Model.

    Covers: Influence, persuasion, coercion

    Freedom of Mind Resource Center, n.d.

    Open Influence Continuum (PDF) (opens in a new tab)

Specialist advice for helping someone leave

ISAJO’s leaving and specialist support directory lists organisations experienced in high-control groups and in supporting people who are helping someone leave. Several offer free information, peer support or initial advice; check each organisation’s age remit, location, fees and current availability. Use specialist advice alongside your school’s safeguarding process.

Find specialist support organisations →

Why online influence deserves attention

A controlling group no longer needs a local meeting place to reach a child. Social media, livestreams, gaming communities and messaging apps allow recruitment to begin online and cross national borders from the outset. Cultic and extremist recruitment can begin in these digital spaces, before a young person has ever met anyone involved in person.

Recruiters can approach young people through interests, humour, self-improvement, identity or a promise of belonging, concealing their aims while building trust. Children are still developing the skills and experience to assess persuasive messages and unequal relationships. A group’s international reach or polished presentation does not establish its trustworthiness.

A public audience and a private inner circle

An influencer’s public posts may look ordinary while a private group, paid community or direct-message channel introduces more extreme ideas, secrecy or demands for loyalty. Treat this as a possible route of escalation, rather than assuming harmless public content makes every private interaction safe. Pay attention when a young person is encouraged to move conversations into closed channels, cut off other viewpoints, keep secrets or prove commitment.

Unexpected personal contact from a high-profile influencer or an account claiming to be them deserves particular care. Young people should pause before replying or moving to a private app, avoid sharing personal information or images, and speak to a trusted adult. A large follower count is not a safety check; the account may also be an impersonator. Adults should respond calmly so that a child can disclose concerns without feeling blamed.

The NSPCC explains online trust-building, secrecy and isolation. For the specific risk of recruitment into terrorism, see the Department for Education’s safeguarding guidance; this has a distinct scope and does not define every high-control group.

Additional practitioner reading and optional paid training

These resources present the publisher’s perspective and complement the practical guidance above. The introductory reading and optional paid course are shown separately; neither replaces school safeguarding procedures.

View sources and references

ISAJO curates educational resources and does not provide direct safeguarding or exit services. Follow your school’s safeguarding procedures when concerned about a pupil. Resources differ in purpose and evidential basis; inclusion does not imply endorsement of every claim or approach.